Overview
The purpose of this article is to discuss the merits of iTunes video quality and
theoretical longevity of improving quality, versus buying DVDs with
their quality.
It compares DVD Quality video (most specifically in this
comparison from Amazon's DVD on-demand) and iTunes SD video. This isn't
exactly Linux related, though I use iTunes through VirtualBox
occasionally when I need things and *ahem* deal with the Draconian
freedom suppression from Apple appropriately so I can enjoy it in Linux.
Why is this important?
Simple: If you want the best video quality you can purchase for your media, it is important to know what you will get if you purchase DVDs, or buy from online services such as iTunes, Google Video, Amazon Video, or elsewhere. In all my research online no one had concisely put all the important facts together in one place. So I had to do my own research and compile the facts, which are herein reported.
Movies (especially those available on Blu-Ray)
BluRay discs at this point are not being
considered because the average BluRay movie blows iTunes off the map in
terms of quality, plus you can get all sorts of extras sometimes. So a
BluRay movie when you can get it is still a great cost-to-value ratio,
far higher than iTunes currently. It is also unlikely that iTunes will
be raising the digital quality (H26 video codec choice, audio and video
quality bitrate levels, etc.) any time soon, since they just hit the
1080p mark for some content.
Results Summary
The situation simplifies down to two scenarios:
- If the content is available on iTunes in HD (meaning High Definition with 720p/1080p), the iTunes options is superior to even the best quality DVD you can find.
- If the content is available on iTunes in SD (meaning Standard Definition with 480p), the DVD options is almost certainly going to be superior to iTunes video.
There is one potential caveat to mention. See below.
If you want more details on how I reached this conclusion, see below for some file specific comparisons.
My opinion on the matter: When SD videos become available in HD, so will Blu-Rays of the media. Just buy those.
DVD Longevity Caveat
There is one potential caveat to mention. With
iTunes there is
potential for longevity. Apple recently upgraded many of their 720p
iTunes videos to 1080p
for free! So if you already owned it, you get it in higher quality. That's really nice. A DVD won't do that for you. But there is a twist to this generosity.
However there is no guarantee that SD video will
ever be available in HD. Converting older media to remastered quality is costly and time consuming. Usually when it is done, there are also Box-sets released on the latest media. So when you see SD video remastered into HD video, you might also see a Blu-Ray Box-set for sale simultaneously.
The 1080p Twist by Apple's iTunes
This is merely an informational section: Apple very likely had the 1080p video available dating back years and years, but refrained from making it available due to playability limitations on some of their various devices. As far as the scuttlebutt on the Internet goes, Apple is
handicapping content lower for one reason: compatibility with the 5th
generation iPod's.
Their recent action should not be seen as a move forward, since they were consciously and actively preventing the vastly greater majority of users from enjoying superior quality, because of a very tiny few legacy users. In essence, this move was not one of going forward; it was of ceasing to suppress quality.
iTunes vs. DVD Comparison Details
iTunes does have a very very large selection of media, but
not all the media is in High-Definition. In fact, most of the older media is
only
in Standard-Definition. For example, Hey Arnold!, El Tigre: The
Adventures of Manny Rivera, Daria, and My Life as a Teenage Robot, are
all only available in SD Version.
I had difficulty finding technical specs documentation. Here
is what I have found so far [
info source here]:
iTunes Rentals:
Apple TV HD - Main Progressive Profile at 1280xN at 4-5mps, 5.1 AC-3 Pass Through.
Apple TV SD - Main Progressive Profile at 720xN Anamorphic (creates 853xN files), likely 2.5 mbps.
iTunes SD - iPod/Basic Progressive Profile at 640xN - Now Anamorphic (which creates 853xN files), 1.5 mbps (maybe higher).
Purchases:
iTunes/Apple TV - iPod/Basic Progressive Profile at 640xN, 1.5 mbps.
Of course, Megabytes per second (mbps) are intimately tied to the
codec in use. In the case of Apple Content as far as I know, it is H.264.
DVDs are encoding using the MPEG-2 video methods.
Researching
on Wikipedia I found this (and though it doesn't cite many sources I
generally know this to be true from personal experience mucking about in
video):
DVD-Video discs have a raw bitrate of 11.08 Mbit/s, with a 1.0 Mbit/s
overhead, leaving a payload bitrate of 10.08 Mbit/s. Of this, up to
3.36 Mbit/s can be used for subtitles and a maximum of 9.80 Mbit/s can
be split amongst audio and video. In the case of multiple angles the
data is stored interleaved, and so there's a bitrate penalty leading to a
max bitrate of 8 Mbit/s per angle to compensate for additional seek
time. This limit is not cumulative, so each additional angle can still
have up to 8 Mbit/s of bitrate available.
Professionally encoded videos average a bitrate of 4-5 Mbit/s with a maximum of 7–8 Mbit/s in high-action scenes.
So
what does this mean? Well, the average DVD, even something with only
4.7GB of disc space capacity, has a considerably higher average video
bitrate per second, compared against the average SD video from iTunes.
But bitrate doesn't include the differences in the video codecs for each data source, so I needed a better test.
Side by Side Comparison
For the comparison of the quality, I picked an episode from my Hey Arnold! DVDs. In particular, this episode is from Season 3, episode 11 Part 2 (or 11b), title "Hey Harold."
[Of note, iTunes may use a different episode numbering system than the established wide-spread one, based on date of initial public release.]
Below is a side-by-side comparison of the visual video quality:
As you can see there are notable differences in the visual quality. The color schemes are different, and there is noticeable picture compression on some of the subtle textures. The interlacing between the two videos is varied in sections, so I don't think I would label one as overall superior to the other for interlacing.
Obviously there is a slight frame size difference as well.
DVD episode
The video dimensions were 720x480. The framerate was 29.970 fps.
The video data amounted to 420MB for 11:48 of time. Doing the math that
is 420 MB divided by 708 seconds, which is an average bitrate on screen
of 0.5932 mbps.
Video format MPEG-2.
Of note, the audio quality was 16.20MB of AC3 192kbps of data.
iTunes SD episode
I put my money where my research is and bought the same episode of Hey Arnold! in SD using iTunes 10.5.
The video dimensions were 640x480. The framerate was 23.976 fps.
The video data amounted to 117.12 MB for 11:48 of time. Doing the math that
is 420 MB divided by 708 seconds, which is an average bitrate on screen
of 0.1654 mbps.
Video format is H.264.
Of note, the audio quality was 10.68MB of AAC 128kbps of data.
Conclusion
This conclusion is pretty straightforward for me. Looking at video bitrate alone, as well as visual quality, even non-remasterd DVDs like this can trump iTunes SD. I'm aware this is only one sample, but the cartoon Hey Arnold! has over 100 episodes that mirror this data out. That's a lot of conforming data. Even disregarding the visual differences, for the shear bitrate differences I would still go with DVD. Plus there is the freedom of playing the DVD anywhere and everywhere, contrasted against Apple's Draconian control model.
For iTunes only offers SD media, buy the DVDs instead. Otherwise, buy the iTunes HD media.
The situation simplifies down to two scenarios:
- If
the content is available on iTunes in HD (meaning High Definition with
720p/1080p), the iTunes options is superior to even the best quality DVD
you can find.
- If the content is available on iTunes in SD
(meaning Standard Definition with 480p), the DVD options is almost
certainly going to be superior to iTunes video.
iTunes SD video may be quite good for its size but it isn't as quality as most DVD video sources.
Video Alternatives
Currently these best alternative options you can find are
listed below. But my conclusion is that either DVDs or iTunes are still your best bet for pure video quality. See above details for where and which.
A good table comparison is also available here:
High-definition video - HD on the World Wide Web - HD Streaming
Google Video
In short summary: As of writing this (December 2012),
Google Video
disregarding selection of available video titles compared to its
competitors, I'm actually having serious trouble finding the
specifications for HD and SD video purchased through Google Play.
Some
reports I have read from only several months ago claim that Google also
has less HD (720p/1080p) video than their competitor(s). Unfortunately my notes don't have the citations and current Google searches fail to confirm or deny this information. If anyone wants to furnish me with detailed specs, I will be happy to list them here.
Amazon Video
In short summary: As of writing this (December 2012),
Amazon Video
it isn't even up to average DVD standard quality [video bitrate per
second]. You can check Wikipedia articles for better details and
explanation on this matter.
Furthermore, at this time Amazon Video isn't even
half the quality of 720p video from iTunes.
Amazon
Video appears more geared towards streaming, and their strategy
currently is less about the highest quality of video available, most
likely due to bandwidth limitations for most customers.
Posts
